Neoliberalism’s Ineffectiveness in Promoting Lasting Peace Explored
As the world grapples with complex geopolitical landscapes, the concept of economic peace-making has resurfaced as a contentious but recurring theme. Central to this dialogue is the notion that economic incentives can pave the way for sustainable resolutions to deeply rooted conflicts, a belief notably championed by various administrations, including that of former U.S. President Donald Trump. This approach, while ambitious, often overlooks the fundamental political realities and historical grievances that shape these conflicts, particularly in regions like Palestine.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has actively pursued what it refers to as peace-making initiatives on a global scale, with a notable focus on leveraging economic incentives to resolve longstanding conflicts. This approach was prominently showcased through plans aimed at facilitating development in areas afflicted by unrest including Gaza, Ukraine, and the contested regions involving Israel and Syria. Critics argue that viewing peace through a purely economic lens is not a novel idea; rather, it reflects a pattern often seen in Western neoliberal peace strategies in the Global South over the past few decades, with Palestine serving as a key case study.
The notion of “economic peace” was initially articulated in the 1990s by Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, who envisioned a “New Middle East” wherein Israel would serve as the economic fulcrum of the region. His proposal aimed to establish an interdependent relationship between Israelis and Palestinians through investments in regional infrastructure, thereby promising stability through economic cooperation. However, this vision failed to realize its potential, as the ongoing occupation intensified following the Oslo Accords and consequently sparked unrest, including the second Intifada.
The limitations of economic-led peace strategies were starkly illustrated again in 2007 when the Quartet—comprising the United Nations, the European Union, the United States, and Russia—entrusted former British Prime Minister Tony Blair with revitalizing the flailing Palestinian economy. Despite showcasing some immediate growth measures under the leadership of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, this approach, often referred to as “Fayyadism,” did not address the overarching issue of the Israeli occupation. It emphasized institutional development and economic growth while neglecting the root causes of economic stagnation.
While elite beneficiaries of this economic framework may have emerged, the broader population remained encumbered by poverty and hardship. The strategy inadvertently replaced a genuine path toward Palestinian self-determination with a slogan of economic management, further entrenching division and dependency rather than fostering unity and empowerment.
Trump’s latest economic proposal for Gaza, orchestrated by his advisor Jared Kushner, similarly seems misaligned with the fundamental rights and aspirations of the Palestinian populace. It has garnered criticism for prioritizing investments and profits for global and regional elites while failing to adequately address the socio-political challenges faced by Palestinians. This framework risks reducing Palestinians to mere economic actors rather than recognizing their collective identity and rights.
Beyond Palestine, the application of this neoliberal economic model is evident in other global conflicts. In the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, proposals to establish a joint economic zone could serve to further marginalize national interests under the pretense of security enhancement, primarily benefiting Israeli authorities. Similarly, in Ukraine, suggestions to create economic zones in contested territories appear to be a strategy designed to allow Russia to increase its influence while undermining Ukraine’s sovereignty.
These neoliberal approaches to peace fail to acknowledge that nations are formed around shared identities and aspirations, not just economic transactions. History has repeatedly shown that conflicts cannot be resolved merely through economic incentives; they require political solutions grounded in justice and respect for collective rights, which must precede any financial engagements. Recognizing the centrality of these factors is crucial for the establishment of lasting peace in any conflict zone.
#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews
